THIS WEEK'S QUESTION
What do you think about this bill?
Linked legislation: H.R. 9340
Checking your account and response...
Voluntary poll for participating Praveta users.
View bill ->
Preparing your Praveta Brief...
Based on official legislative actions published by Congress.
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate. (CR S5199)
This timeline shows the bill's position in the federal legislative process based on official congressional actions.
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 417 - 3 (Roll no. 312). (text: CR H5656-5657)
Praveta uses official congressional material as its source of truth. You can review the underlying record directly.
Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 57 - 43. Record Vote Number: 254.
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate. (CR S5199)
The bill would push states to adopt a rule making big data-center customers cover necessary grid upgrade costs.
Applies to non-residential customers with 100 MW peak demand or more
Directs states to consider a federal standard for large-load customers
Requires rates to recover full incremental upgrade costs from those customers
Requires financial assurances before utilities build required upgrades
If adopted, the change would likely shift grid upgrade costs and financial risk toward very large data‑center customers and affect utility planning and contracting practices.
State utility regulators, nonregulated utilities, and very large non‑residential electric customers (e.g., data centers).
Text provided is the bill proposal; the source does not show congressional action or final passage.
Praveta summarizes official congressional material and keeps the underlying source available for review.